#72: Sending pages from your pocket

Browsing on mobile devices is the main way people use the web. As mentioned in ToW #62, the last decade has seen a complete shift from PC & Mac being used for nearly 70% of web traffic to the dominant platforms being Android and iOS.

One nuance the stats don’t take into account, though, is that most of the 30% who’re still on Windows & OS X will also be browsing on whatever phone they have. It’s not uncommon to see people sitting in front of a desktop or laptop, while using their phone for other things – be that reading stuff in a mobile web browser or using a dedicated app.

Sharing is Caring

One feature common to all the main mobile browsers and their desktop equivalents is the ability to send pages (or tabs) from one to the other, assuming you’re signed in on both using the same account. While the meedja appears to work on the assumption that everyone+dog has an iPhone, around 2/3 of mobile browsing is done with Google Chrome and variants, and over 70% of the browsing devices are running Android.

For those reasons, we’re going to use Android and Windows as the use case for this week’s tip, but the same things can also be done on Mac + iOS. Probably.

Mobile apps -> desktop

If you’re sitting on the sofa flicking through stuff, there will be times where it’s easier to look at the content on a bigger screen. Sure, you might be able mirror the device on the big TV, but who ever does that?

Let’s say you’re browsing an eBay listing and want to send it to your laptop so you can see the pictures better. One option is to try using Google’s Quick Share to send something straight from a phone app to the PC, once you’ve set up the software and signed in.  Mac users need to jump through some additional non-official hoops.

Quick Share is the new name for “Nearby Share” –  start by clicking the sharing icon on the top of the eBay app (or from whatever app you’re looking to share something).

Article content

How the app behaves will differ from one to another; in the case of the eBay app, it will offer to send a link to this listing to some other app on the device, including the ability to share it elsewhere.

Article content

The list of apps (and contacts) will vary depending on usage. If you have Microsoft’s Phone Link already set up between your phone and PC, you can just fire it to your PC using the Send to PC command, and it will open a new browser page right away. If using Quick Share, you’ll get a prompt to open it.

Mobile browser -> desktop

Another more general and consistent use case is when you’re on the phone using a web browser rather than an app. Clicking the Share icon in Chrome will let you copy the link to the phone’s clipboard or send it to a variety of other contacts or apps (just as in the previous eBay app example), or “Send to devices”: in this case, any other device where you’re also logged in to Chrome with the same Google ID. You could also screen grab the page or generate a QR code, so if you want to share the link with someone nearby, you can do that more easily than faffing about with Bluetooth.

Article content

After tapping this option and choosing the relevant PC, you’ll see a notification show up in Chrome.

Article content

You’ll also see “Your devices” if you expand Chrome’s History either in the menu or by pressing CTRL+H…

Article content

From Edge to Edge

Some small proportion of Microsoft fans might be running the mobile Edge browser on their Android or even iOS phones. It’s a surprisingly good mobile browsing experience with built-in ad blocker, password saving integration with Microsoft Authenticator and an inevitable smatter of Copilotry.

Edge Mobile was built on the Chromium browser engine and released a year before the main desktop Edge was ported to Chromium too. As a result, many features in Google Chrome are also carried over (since it, unsurprisingly, is also based on Chromium), except that you’d be running Edge on your mobile device and signing into Edge on your PC or Mac using a Microsoft Account.

Similar to how Chrome does it, Edge will also let you send links to your PC or Mac – the quickest way is to go to the “hamburger” 3-line menu in the bottom right, and choose “Send to devices” to get a list of potential target computers. The menu that appears on the mobile browser may be several pages wide; swipe left and right to see the others and press and hold anywhere on the menu to edit it, allowing you to reorder the icons or hide/show them.

Article content

Just as Chrome behaves, having sent the link to one or multiple PCs, a notification will appear in desktop Edge inviting you to open it…

Article content

… and if you have the browser on PC and phone both set up to sync with your Microsoft Account, you’ll also see previous pages browsed on the phone by looking in the History page (CTRL+H) in Edge on the PC, which makes it easy to go back to pages you had previously viewed on the phone without needing to deliberately send them across.

Article content

#71: Trying to search on LinkedIn

a cartoon image of a man sitting in front of a desktop computer screen, showing him trying to search

Since you’re not reading this on LinkedIn, you’re maybe not one of the believersStay strong! It’s been nearly 9 years since Microsoft announced its plan to blow $26Bn on acquiring the social network for business users, supposedly in competition with Salesforce, Facebook, Google…

At the time, Forbes commented:

This new deal means Microsoft can embed LinkedIn with Skype, its email system and other enterprise products so that, in the words of one Silicon Valley expert, it will be able ‘to recreate the connective tissue for enterprises.’

It seems the Skype integration never really did pan out. Outlook and LinkedIn never got especially close, and Salesforce’s nightmare of Microsoft poring over all that data and not letting anyone else get access to it never really materialised. Even Microsoft tools don’t really have very good access to the data.

One of us (but not really)

At the time, the LinkedIn acquisition was Microsoft’s largest and seen as quite risky, with the backdrop of a failed $45B bid for Yahoo! and not-exactly-successful integrations of multi-billion buyouts of Nokia and others.

There was some consternation on how LinkedIn could possibly be worth all that money – one of the most popular internal Microsoft Yammer communities has even been reborn in LinkedIn, for current and former ‘softies alike …

Article content

(though Groups in LI seem to be less functional than Facebook Groups, so the place to go is FB’s Microsoft Old-timers, which has about 30x as many members).

In truth, LinkedIn has been very successfulas pointed out by the excellent Jack Rowbotham:

Article content

It’s said there are over 1 billion users. LinkedIn revenue was reported as growing 9% year-on-year in the FY25 Q2 results. Though revenue numbers are combined with other groups, Statista reckons that totals about $16B annual revenue. Not bad.

Maybe what has been LinkedIn’s biggest reason for success in the Microsoft family is that it’s never really been fully assimilated. Sure, management sits at the top table (and co-founder Reid Hoffman is on the board) but LinkedIn has been kept (or kept itself?) at arm’s length; Microsoft friends and partners are not LinkedIn friends and partners. LinkedIn employees have linkedin.com primary email addresses, not microsoft.com ones (even if they may also have a lesser-user microsoft.com address…) There’s a certain defiance of separateness even after almost a decade, a bit like Dynamics used to be or as GitHub also is.

Even the platform it runs on is not quite fully on the bus – after announcing a plan to gradually move to Azure and run on Azure Linux instead of CentOS, that has reportedly been binned in favour of a hybrid model.

Searching for stuff

To paraphrase Yoda: Search not: Find, though that is sometimes easier said than done. Along with holding itself apart organisationally and technically from the rest of Microsoft, LinkedIn has a somewhat stubbornly different look and feel to everything else that comes from Redmond.

Searching on LinkedIn starts with entering whatever you’re looking for in the search bar on the home page.

Article content

There are few operators you can use – AND/OR and putting stuff in quotes can help to guide things, but you will need to use the Posts / Companies etc filters to zone in to the right content, and you can only do that after the first search has been run. Note that AND, OR and NOT must be in capitals and they specifically call out that + / – isn’t supported.

So, if you want to find something – a previous post in a newsletter you’d read, for example – there isn’t an easy way to do it without first searching everything, then telling LinkedIn that you don’t want “people” but something else. Even going to the newsletter home page doesn’t give you the ability to search its contents, which seems like an own goal.

If you’re looking for a Post you may get a button offering “From my network”, and clicking on that will invoke a filter to select your top  connections, people you follow or your own posts.

Article content

But you might not get that option. If you don’t, then you need to select Posts and then use the Date, Content type or, in this example, “From Member” filter. If you’re looking for your own content, you need to type your own name and have it resolve, before clicking on show results.

Article content

More help is available on Search on LinkedIn, and you might notice that some filters stick sometimes (but not always) so if you’ve already set the Posts and From:me filters up, then others searches will keep them until you clear the filters, or they somehow just clear themselves.

Article content

When you do get results, depending on what you search for, you’ll be presented a list of things that look like they match, but there’s no highlighting of the search terms to see where that match is, so you’ll need to open them up individually to see if they match.

For the more adventurous, you could hack the URL to add search terms and set the filters – eg

https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/content/?keywords=vermouth%20AND%20recipe&postedBy=%5B%22me%22%5D

There are some special characters in that URL – %20 is space, %22 is “ and %5B and %5D are square brackets, so you could actually enter

https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/content/?keywords=vermouth AND recipe&postedBy=[“me”]

… and the browser will sort it out.

Or just search, get a wide range of initial results then use the filters. It’s less “correct” but it’s bound to be quicker.

#70: Two Score and Ten years

50 years ago to this very day, a small company called Micro-Soft was formed. Over the last half-century it has grown unbelievably, touched many lives and at varying times has had legions of fans and detractors alike.

There has been a lot of coverage on Microsoft’s own social channels and on their special website, Cheers to 50 years – Microsoft Unlocked, which covers a lot of ground and tells some interesting tales. Other takes include last year’s Wired special, slightly less curated by corp PR, Microsoft at 50: An AI Giant. A Kinder Culture. And Still Hellbent on Domination.

Stories often help to define a corporate culture but also to explain it to outsiders too. Sometimes, they feature as a backdrop to something else entirely. Let’s look at one in particular, the rocket that took Microsoft into orbit: the original PC.

Project Chess came to town

Much has been written about IBM deciding it wanted a piece of the burgeoning early 1980s home/small office computer market, as defined by popular machines like the Trash 80 or the Apple II. Big Blue was worried that it might miss the bandwagon and at the same time was concerned that corporate customers could put a highly spec-ed Apple II on their desk and run financial analysis from there, instead of relying on the IBM Big Iron in the Data Processing dept. Finance Directors and accountants could get instant answers for a few $K with VisiCalc on their Apple II, instead of waiting for the wonks in DP to turn reports around in 24hrs.

An Apple II with 48K of RAM had a list price of over $2.5K (something like $12K in today’s money), but the cheapest IBM computer at the time was more than five times as much. When IBM brass gave the go-ahead for what was to be “Project Chess” – to build an IBM personal computer – one stipulation was that it had to be ready in 12 months, with a prototype to be produced in only 1 month, with a target cost of $1,500.

This compressed timeline, and the need to keep costs low, meant usual IBM practices of building everything in-house had to go. As much componentry as possible was sourced off-the-shelf – controllers, disk drives, etc – and when it came to choosing software, they beat a path to Bill Gates’ door for Microsoft BASIC. At the time, every computer needed a programming language, and that’s what Microsoft did – developer tools for hobbyists, essentially.

So the Suits came to Redmond, and licensed Basic (and other languages). They happened to also ask if Bill & co could point them in the direction of a suitable operating system. The popular CP/M was identified as a possible – in fact, Microsoft made a bit of hardware called SoftCard that could run CP/M on Apple II machines, so compatible apps were also available to Apple users. CP/M was produced by a company called Digital Research, which was rumoured might have merged with Microsoft at one point (and was later acquired by Novell).

That NDA

When IBM’s reps went the following day to visit Digital Research in California, the boss – Gary Kildall – was not around (there are various stories as to why, but they’re not important right now). IBM’s team slapped their standard and very one-sided Non-Disclosure Agreement on the table, but DR’s lawyer and COO wouldn’t sign it; it could be summarised as, “Don’t tell us anything confidential; if you do tell us anything and we act on it, you can’t sue us. If we tell you anything confidential and you act on any of it, we’ll sue you”.

After a protracted impasse with DR, IBM went back to Microsoft and asked Bill to sort out the operating system problem; Bill & Paul Allen had already worked with a guy from another small company in Seattle, to do the prototype of the CP/M SoftCard and as luck would have it, partly because Digital Research was dragging its feet on 16-bit CP/M, he had built a 16-bit OS for Intel chips. Microsoft bought it, hired its author, and then built PC-DOS and later MS-DOS for the IBM PC, which went on to be wildly successful.

For more detail on the IBM side of things, see this good summary from PCMag – Project Chess: The Story Behind the Original IBM PC.

IBM’s missteps opened the door

IBM’s management believed that their economy of scale meant that even if other companies tried to build a “PC”, they could never do it cheaply enough to be a threat. Over the next few years, other pioneers managed to consolidate the number of chips and other parts required, but IBM’s proprietary BIOS chip, whose software controlled how the hardware worked together, was the key to true compatibility. Even if you built an exact copy of the PC hardware, it wouldn’t run DOS or any of the other applications with 100% success, unless the BIOS looked and behaved the same as IBM’s.

A company called Phoenix first reverse-engineered the IBM BIOS and started selling their “compatible” version, allowing for companies like Compaq and Dell to spring up, building 100% compatible machines which were cheaper than Big Blue’s, and in time got the jump by adopting newer and faster hardware (like 386 processors) before IBM did. The genie was now well out of the bottle, and despite their attempts to re-assert control with the PS/2 system and OS/2 software, IBM’s grip on the massively growing ecosystem had slipped. 20 years ago, they bailed out of the PC business they had invented, selling up to Lenovo.

The best deal in corporate history…

When IBM agreed to buy the operating system for that first Personal Computer 5150 – “PC Disk Operating System”, aka PC-DOS, the initial offer was to pay Microsoft to develop it but to give IBM all the rights. Bill pushed back and said Microsoft wanted to have the rights to sell a version – MS-DOS – to other companies too.

IBM was in such a hurry to do the deal – and thinking that nobody could build a cheaper, compatible machine anyway – agreed to let Microsoft have rights on MS-DOS.

Without this decision, it’s almost certain that the PC industry would not exist. There would be no Windows; maybe OS/2 would have been the GUI on the high-end, only-available-from-IBM PC (such as the strategy was behind the PS/2). Apple might have dominated with the completely proprietary Macintosh, and would that have evolved as much without the competition from hundreds of PC vendors? Would something else have come along instead?

The availability of a Phoenix BIOS and MS-DOS meant anyone could build a compatible and competitive machine. By the mid-1990s, over 200M PCs had been sold, though IBM had only around 8% of that market (Compaq overtaking it to be the largest single PC vendor in 1994).

Thanks to that one business decision made by IBM, Bill Gates & co, a multi-trillion dollar industry grew up.

Microsoft revenues from 1984 – 1999


Further Reading & Listening

If you’re interested in these snippets from the history books, there are many other sources of information.

Microsoft Volume I: The Complete History and Strategy – a 4-hour magnum opus podcast covering many points in the story of Microsoft. They talks about Project Chess and some of the points made above (from about 1h20m into the podcast).


Hard Drive: Bill Gates and the Making of the Microsoft Empire by James Wallace

One of the earliest chronicles of Bill Gates’ story and how Microsoft came into being, published in 1992 – so 17 years after the company came from nothing, and a little more than a decade after IBM launched the first PC. Lots happened since then, but this is a compelling account.


Arguably the best telling of the history behind lots of the early personal computer industry comes from ex-InfoWorld columnist, Bob Cringely. Accidental Empires (from 1992 before revisions) is entertaining and compelling – a must-read for anyone interested in this period. The chapter, “Chairman Bill Leads the Workers in Song” talks about what made BillG tick. The section on Steve Jobs, “The Prophet” (itself prophetic, as the book was written before Jobs came back to Apple and saved it from certain death), starts, “The most dangerous man in Silicon Valley sits alone on many weekday mornings, drinking coffee at II Fornaio, an Italian restaurant on Cowper Street in Palo Alto”

Cringely (or, rather, his real persona, Mark Stephens) produced a video series, “The Triumph of the Nerds(also pre-Jobs-as-Lazarus) which is basically a summary of the book, and is well worth watching – episode 2 covers the PC history; ep1 deals with the origin story of MITS and Apple, while ep3 covers the Apple Mac and Windows rivalry.

It’s absolutely brilliant. If you only read one book on the backstory of Silicon Valley and the PC industry which grew out of it, make it this one.


Showstopper! was an exceptional under-the-covers story of how Microsoft went from relying on a pretty flaky Windows-built-on-DOS offering, to building out a “proper” operating system which initially went into serious and professional environments. Guided by legendary ex-DEC operating system guru, Dave Cutler, Windows NT was fundamental to Microsoft’s push into the enterprise, finished off Novell on the server estate, went toe-to-toe with Unix in Workstations, and subsequently underpinned Windows XP and every Windows version since.


The first chapter of Microserfs started as a series of articles in Wired, before being published in a book in 1995. It charts a story about a software startup which grew from Microsoft; that first chapter starts by talking about Bill like some kind of mythological figure. The book name-checks lots of mid-90s references in the Redmond area, building numbers, local food outlets and so on. Anyone who was familiar with that region at that time must read this book.

The main character is Dan Underwood, and a few pages into the book he says “I am danielu@microsoft.com”. Years later, there really was a danielu and he used to get several emails a month saying things like “I read your book…”

He’s not there any more so don’t bother (or maybe he got MSIT to change his alias).

You had me at EHLO


Others worth a look

Barbarians Led by Bill Gates by Jennifer Edstrom – from 1998, just as the anti-trust heavies  were getting involved. This is a warts-and-all hatchet job from people who were inside at the time, or connected closely to the top brass.

Overdrive: Bill Gates and the Race to Control Cyberspace by James Wallace – A follow up to “Hard Drive”, dealing with Microsoft in the Netscape era.

Other recommendations from ex-Microsoftie David Gristwood


Oh, and for the real origin story, check out Celebrating 50 years of Microsoft from Bill Gates himself, charting how he and Paul Allen were inspired to found the company to write BASIC for that original 1975 computer, the MITS Altair 8800. The Personal Computer industry began 50 years ago, and marked a profound change from being mostly dependent on hardware innovation – as previous computers did – to one being all about the value and magic of software.

Happy Anniversary, Microsoft! Many of us were lucky to fall into the ecosystem you created, and have built happy and successful careers working with brilliant people ever since.

#69: Thinking Deeply

Designer (24)

It’s a little over 47 years since the Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy was first broadcast on the radio, followed by the publication of the written work the following year. It took the most powerful supercomputer, “Deep Thought”, 7.5 million years to come up with the Answer to the Ultimate Question.

deepthought

Who knows in the modern era how long it would take? Things have changed a lot over the last 50 years, and surely Google et al could manage a reply quicker than that.

It seems that the answers to many important but previously impossible questions are only a moment’s search away.

A screenshot of a web page

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Copilot’s Getting Deeper

Microsoft quietly unveiled an additional feature to its main Copilot offering – i.e. the free, web thing or Copilot app on PC or mobile (as opposed to the paid-for Microsoft 365 offering, or any other app’s Copilot-branded functionality).

Go to copilot.ai and just below the prompt, select the drop-down to change the mode – with a single click on the flower-like icon (which is not at all like the OpenAI logo), you can get it to Think Deeper.

Screenshot 2025-03-28 081649

Screenshot 2025-03-28 081837

This feature uses the fairly recent o3-mini (high) model from OpenAI (which runs on Azure, don’t you know… well at least most of it does), giving additional insight into whatever you’re asking. It doesn’t take much longer to answer compared to the regular reply so you might just think about using it all the time for questions of moderate complexity. And it’s free.

ChatGPT itself has a “Deep Research” function which is available to paying users (Plus or Pro), and Microsoft has also unveiled a forthcoming “Researcher” capability that will be part of the Microsoft 365 Copilot commercial offering, alongside some deep reasoning stuff for agents built in Copilot Studio. It’s all getting really deep, man.

Wannabe Record Breakers

As well as Copiloting-everything (mostly based on top of OpenAI stuff), Microsoft has been looking further afield and building its own AI technologies. There’s still plenty of Ayy Eye noise coming from Redmond, and an AI Skills Fest virtual event starting in April is going to keep the foot on the gas.

It might have one of the more obscure Guinness World Records, too…

A group of people looking at a glass board

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Let’s not get too excited now, kiddies. There are plenty of strange records to aspire to.

#68: It’s all about the prompt

A cartoon of a person talking to another person

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

When internet search engines took off in the mid 90s – remember Alta Vista? – and Google exploded into the public consciousness in the early 2000s, it became increasingly apparent that getting good search results were helped by being able to ask your question correctly.

Savvy searchers might use a combination of quotes and other “operators” to specify an exact phrase, or guide the search engine to include only certain terms or results from a particular website (such as site:tipoweek.com onenote). Google and Bing both tend to use the same operators (so, as Scott Hanselman would say, you could “Google with Bing”).

Prompting Today

A screenshot of a computer screen

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

When using some of the many AI tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini etc, you can get very relevant results by being quite specific in what you ask it to do. As an example, one of the best ToW banner images was created using Microsoft Designer with the prompt, “a serene image of a young boy sitting at an old laptop (with Windows 10) but lurking in the dark background is the grim reaper”

A child sitting in a chair with a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Or, getting much more detailed, see Kat Beedim’s detailed 200+ word instructions to create consistently-formatted notes from meeting transcripts.

Being much more verbose and directional than you’d ever try in a regular search engine can give some quite remarkable results. The order of what you ask might vary the emphasis given to certain parts of the response, and the general advice is to be positive – i.e. ask for things you want, rather than telling it what you don’t want.

A polar bear and cub in the snow

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

It seems that AI can suffer from a variant of Dostoevsky’s “White Bear Problem”; ie. Asking it not to do something increases the likelihood of doing it. Not long after Microsoft went big on Copilot and Designer, here’s one example when Copilot was asked to draw an image on a particular topic…

No photo description available.

The idea was to convey a background threat with those hooded figures, not the feeling that the poor girl was in imminent peril. The figures lurking in the background might be a mite less sinister if they weren’t armed, so clarification was called for…

No photo description available.

Maybe DALL-E 3 at that time was just fixated with firearms, or asking it not to do something was a step too far. We’ve gone from “some guns” to “pointing guns at her”. Hmmm.

No photo description available.

Trying the same prompt in Designer seemingly gets a little less gun-heavy now, but still has the odd one creeping in. Trying to be more explicit doesn’t appear to work… adding to the end of the prompt, “The sinister hooded figures are not carrying guns of any kind”.

You might think that instruction is simple enough, but no. It seems to be interpreted as “you want more guns? Gotcha”.

A person sitting at a desk with a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Further reading

See here for some more tips on Copilot, or take a look at some pearls from the Copilot support team. Also, look out for some more in-depth instructions on using ChatGPT.

For business Copilot with M365 users, the Copilot Prompt Gallery is worth a play.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

For other Copilot ideas, check out Chris Stuart Ridout talking about Prompt Buddy, a Teams app which lets users share good prompts with others in the company.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

#67: Are you sitting comfortably?

Regular readers of ToW might have spotted the caption under the main image of last week’s missive: it was a photo of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, for a 1991 article in Fortune magazine written to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the PC. Taken at Jobs’ house, the image shows supposed soap-dodger Steve barefoot astride a lounge chair, with Bill perched on its footstool, or “ottoman”.

There are no official online archives of this article (at least, not easily found) however physical copies pop up at auction on occasion and there is at least one downloadable scanned copy.

fortune

The chair / stool in question is an iconic shape, known as the Eames Lounge Chair and designed in 1956 by couple Charles and Ray Eames for the Herman Miller furniture company. You may remember Herman Miller from the ubiquitous and not-inexpensive Aeron office chair.

Buying a genuine Herman Miller Eames chair in the US will cost a pretty penny (even old ones running to thousands), though licensed versions were made in Europe and Asia. Vitra still sells their version now, though be sure to be sitting down before you look at the price.

If you’re keen to add a bit of mid-century chic to your home without further ruining your financial future, knock-off versions are available on eBay. Or, especially if based in the UK, look at Iconic Interiors, who produce a high-quality replica at a fraction of the price of the official one.

So that’s the comfy seating for putting the world to rights taken care of; what about the day-to-day seating for getting the work done?

The Desk-jockey

Designer (21)

Deskbound office workers are reckoned to spend between anything up to 9 hours a day slouched at their desk, leading to more than 2 months a year of being officially “sedentary”. Businesses insisting on staff returning to the office for much or all of the working week could trumpet the benefits on their physical and mental wellbeing compared to the WFHers, though perhaps they should make sure they have an environment that can accommodate everyone.

Having a sit/stand desk is one way of avoiding the doldrums as long as you remember to actually use it standing up occasionally. If you’re a hybrid/home worker, FlexiSpot do a decent range that’s not shockingly expensive, in case you’re looking for recommendation; also available in the UK. Why limit yourself to merely sitting or standing, when you could do so much more at your desk?

Should your employer decide that you need to be in the office all the time, they do have some responsibility in making sure the workspace isn’t going to cause harm. The UK’s Elfin Safety executive even has published requirements, which could be handy if you’re trying to persuade your employer that sitting at a cafeteria table all day isn’t good enough.

How to sit at your desk

Sit up straight. Shoulders back, don’t slouch. Feel on the floor and don’t cross your legs. Keep your elbows at 90 degrees. Raise the height of your chair. That screen needs to be higher. You might have seen these pieces of advice before, but not all are necessarily correct, and you can certainly find plenty of supporters for and against.

One view is that you need to keep your feet behind your hips. This could stop your back from curving as you sit at the desk. Others would say, don’t sit straight, instead recline your chair. It’s quite probable that your seat is too low – many office chairs just don’t even adjust high enough, or may have large armrests that stop you sitting close enough to the desk.

The UK’s HSE recommended posture follows fairly conventional groups – sit straight, have your chair at a height where your elbows are level with your hands, and have the top of your monitor at eye level.

laptopy

If you have a laptop, ideally use an external keyboard and put your PC on books or a dedicated stand to raise it up so the screen is high enough to not make you stoop or bend your neck down. Working in the typical laptop hunch is bearable on a train or plane, maybe OK sitting at a temporary desk for an hour, but should definitely not be the norm for whole days at a stretch.

There are extremes you could go to in trying to perfect ergonomics, but if all you do is sit with elbows level to your keyboard and eyeballs level with the screen, you’ll be going in the right direction.

#66: A computer on every desk?

0603722711647-web-tete

A computer on every desk, and in every home, running Microsoft software” – was an early and, at the time, unbelievably ambitious goal for a small company from Albuquerque which later moved up to Bellevue, WA.

Things have moved on radically since Microsoft was founded nearly 50 years ago; now, everyone who needs a computer on a desk has one, and billions more have one on their lap or in their hand. SteveB talked recently, in a retrospective “Alumni Voices” interview, about the early days.

Thinking about PC usage (for Windows and Macs); laptops overtook desktops some years ago (notebooks outselling desktops 4:1). Laptop manufacturers evolve them more quickly, with better screens, longer battery life and now, ramming in AI features, often refreshing their ranges regularly.

But if you sit at a desk most of the time, and all your data is in the cloud anyway, shouldn’t your primary computer be a desktop? Maybe you could have a medium-spec laptop for when you need to be mobile, and a comparatively high-end desktop for the rest of the time?

If you’re using a laptop for work and spend much of your work/life in one place, at least make sure you get a proper monitor.

I found this image at the top when searching, “is it OK to sit on the ottoman of an Eames chair?” – the answer was captioned, “it is, if you’re Bill Gates”

Article content

Moore’s law

The oft-mis-quoted effect (that stuff gets faster/cheaper/bigger all the time) of Moore’s law could be applied to the growth in laptop usage;  there’s more to be gained from miniaturization when you’re carrying a machine around, as well as advances in battery and display technology.

Desktops have tended to be left behind; there’s no built-in screen (unless they’re an all-in-1), they don’t run on batteries and they often sit out of sight, with the user interacting through a separate mouse, keyboard and looking at a desktop monitor. Old PCs were boring to look at, sometimes quite noisy and clearly fixed in position.

Now, many new home desktops are sold as gaming PCs with high end graphics and are often adorned with elaborate cooling, colourful lights and the like.

Acer Predator Orion 5000 (2024) review

The rise of the Mini

Around 20 years ago, capable desktop PCs started to shrink in size – it wasn’t uncommon to see demos being run from a “Shuttle Box”, which had way more storage and CPU horsepower than could be gotten from a laptop of the time, so it was possible to run servers in VMs on Virtual PC or similar.

Mac Mini and other small-form devices followed, but were often relegated to secondary use.

Julian Datta and Brett Johnson, posing in 2007 with a Shuttle which worked so hard it was literally smokin

Desktops for today

If you’re running a laptop from a home office and sit at a desk 90% of your day, it’s worth looking at getting a modern, small form desktop. They’re quiet, can be much neater than a laptop with loads of cables or a docking station, and can be surprisingly cheap.

An Dell Inspiron with Intel i5 10-core CPU, 16GB RAM and 1TB SSD can cost £650 (eg Dell Inspiron Desktop with the Latest Intel Processors). If you’re using an existing screen setup from an older laptop, you might need to buy a webcam too. A broadly comparable laptop might cost £100 or more extra, though it might last a good bit less time than a well-spec’ed desktop.

Desktops are generally more self-upgradeable and repairable than laptops, though that tends to change when you get into highly miniaturized machines. Framework, who build laptops that are sold as being fixable rather than disposable, recently unveiled their first desktop too

Framework | Configure Framework Desktop DIY Edition (AMD Ryzen™ AI Max

Further reading

If you’re already (or still) using a desktop for everyday computing, feel free to comment for others to hear your thoughts. If you’re just desktop-curious, check out some recent reviews…

The ASUS NUC 15 Pro Is Built for Upgrades

I moved my workflow to a Windows 11 PC no bigger than a bagel | Windows Central

Chuwi UBox mini PC review | TechRadar

#65: Enshittifcation 2025 pt 1 – progressing well

A computer on a table

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

The “word of the year” for 2023 was “Enshittification” – as defined by author Cory Doctorow:

“Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.”.

Similar concepts have been written about previously.

An Australian dictionary summarized it nicely in 2024 as “The gradual deterioration of a service or product brought about by a reduction in the quality of service provided, especially of an online platform, and as a consequence of profit-seeking.”

There are numerous variants of enshittification which we’ve all observed, usually concerned with improving revenue streams for the service provider at the expense of the quality of the service or organizations failing in some way.

· Changing the business model of the service because the original premise isn’t sustainable

· Killing products or removing features which cost too much to provide

· Failure to adapt with technology, stifling innovation, leading to stagnation and irrelevance

· Decline of a service or community due to poor leadership, user behaviour or rise of another

· Trapping customers, making it inordinately difficult to cancel or migrate from the service

Sometimes these moves are long planned – capture the market by operating at a loss then pay back your investors later by reaping the rewards of early market advantage, potentially even turning the screws on your customers (see Amazon, Netflix). Companies might be overaggressive competitors, looking to quash alternatives (Amazon, Microsoft), and it’s just a fact of life that some things don’t work and walking away from them angers or disappoints customers who used them (see Google, Microsoft, many others).

2025 In

This year is barely 20% over but we’ve already seen numerous changes to popular online services. Netflix is cranking up subscription pricing again (among others); Microsoft has added Copilot features to Personal and Family plans, jacking the cost up significantly to pay for it. Spotify has been teasing a lossless service for years, but might get around to launching it this summer. Hands up who thinks it will be an extra cost over the standard tier?

Even if a service provider puts out notice that they’re going to make some degrading change (or if, as WindowsForum.com does about all the upcoming Microsoft cuts, others collect the news and report it), it can still feel like a shock when you notice it’s not there any more. Microsoft calls it “deprecation”.

As mentioned in ToW #62, there are lots of occasions where a feature changes very much for the worse (from a user’s perspective) but there’s nothing much you can do about it other than seek an alternative.

Search caching

One relatively quiet change that happened in both Google and Bing during 2024 was the removal of cached pages in search results. This was a handy way to find a web page which, for whatever reason, wasn’t online any more … though could be used to find out how a page looked before some recent change. “Link Rot” means that lots of pages link to sites that have disappeared.

Both Google and Bing used to have cached copies of pages that could be viewed by clicking an icon next to the item in search results.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Google discontinued it without notice in February 2024, so people who noticed would turn to Bing, Yahoo or Baidu as they all still offered the cached feature. The reasons for removal? “It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading. These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it.”

Bing followed suit in December, saying, This week, we’ve removed cache links from Bing search results. As the internet has evolved for better reliability, and many pages aren’t optimized for cache viewing.”

Both reasons smack of “we’re doing this because it makes your life simpler and the feature wasn’t needed any more anyway”, but in reality there will be cost savings and potentially legislative reasons too. Why offer the service if you can’t monetize it? What’s next?

Google has since wired in a link to the Internet Archive – a free, useful resource though sometimes a bit slow and not always complete – if you click the “:” to the side of a search result, then click through to “More about this page ->”.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Turn to specific addins

One of the use cases for looking at cached results is to see how something was previously described before it was updated; or maybe to see how much something was being advertised for, previously? Have you ever seen a product marked as “SOLD” and wondered what it had priced at before?

It may be worth looking at the various extensions / app stores to see if there’s an enterprise developer who’s built something that might help. One such is the excellent AT Price Tracker, for the UK Autotrader website.

A screenshot of a car

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Who’d want to be trying to sell luxury 3-ton EV-SUVs at the moment?

AT Price Tracker will show a summary of what the same advert has been listed at previously; traders could remove it entirely and re-post to fox the logic of the app, but it’s presumably under the radar enough for most not to even notice it.

Unless Autotrader decides to get some enshittification in and block whatever access the addin has.

#64: Tick, Tock, Time is up (nearly) for Windows 10

Designer (16)

Microsoft developed a reputation for having a couple of shaky versions of anything before the one that you’d be actually happy to use came along. Just as many people do with phone releases, it often seems to make sense skipping a few and just get the latest whenever it’s time to upgrade the computer.

There’s that old joke: “How does Bill Gates count to 10?” The latest answer is “1, 2, 3, 3.1, 3.11, NT3.1/3.5, 95, NT4, 98, ME, 2000, XP, Vista, 7, 8, 8.1, 10, 11”. Windows 3.1 was the first to be what you might call mainstream, and XP, 7 and 10 were the versions which got the most users.

Returning to the compelling Statcounter site (as mentioned in ToW #62); it bases its research on which machines/browsers are seen being used to access a host of websites. There are still a lot of people using older Windows versions. Surprisingly, 0.27% of all browsing being done by Windows users was by brave souls still on Windows XP. Vista is barely above 0.

Data from Desktop Windows Version Market Share Worldwide | Statcounter Global Stats

Windows 8/8.1 (the dark green line which peaked in mid-2015) never really took off – maybe because of corporates who had rolled out Windows 7 as an upgrade to XP (having steered well clear of Vista) and user resistance to the touch-centricity of the whole thing, especially useless if you’re on a desktop PC.

When Windows 10 came out in mid-2015, it took 2½ years for it to overtake Windows 7 in usage, at least according to this data. Windows 11 was released in October 2021 but in well  over 3 years since, it still has less than 2/3rd the usage of Windows 10.

Support Lifecycle

Microsoft took a view some years back, that in order to be credible in the Enterprise, you need to support your stuff for a long time. As a result, the standard lifecycle is for every product to have 10 years of life, usually split 50/50 into Mainstream and Extended support. Extended means you might get security fixes but there will be no more updates to add features, make it better, jam adverts into places you don’t want them etc.

On 14th October 2025, Windows 10 hits that decade milestone – at which point it will go out of support, there will be no more security updates and if you get hit by a cyber attack then that’s too bad. In future, you’d be ridiculed for it when anything goes wrong.

Performing an operating system upgrade can be a big deal – especially if you’re doing it on behalf of a company or large organisation – as some of the existing hardware and software might not work under the new OS. Windows 11 complicates things further by having some fairly specific hardware requirements in the worthy name of security; but even some expensive PCs from a year or two before COVID are now excluded. Many of Microsoft’s own Surface range are upgradeable, but the flagship $4K Surface Studio sold from 2016-2018 is not one of them.

If you have a Windows 10 PC then it’s very likely it will have been offered Windows 11 as an upgrade; if in any doubt, then try the PC Health Check app and see what it says.

How to run Windows 11 on unsupported hardware

tl;dr – don’t.

It’s worth noting that the majority of PCs which can happily run Windows 10 would also be able to run Win11 if they were allowed to. The hardware requirements dictated, though, that you need a certain level of processor and a TPM 2.0 security module, or you get denied.

There have been various tricks and tweaks to fool Windows 11 into running through the upgrade process and letting it continue; some of them even offered up by Microsoft itself. Lately, however, the signal has been that even if the unsupported machine made it to Windows 11 now, it could be blocked in future from getting subsequent updates and therefore would be in limbo. Microsoft’s own advice if you have followed one of these unofficial workarounds, is to revert now to Windows 10.

The previously-toted registry key to bypass the hardware validation has now been removed, in order to prevent any more unsuspecting souls from going down that path.

Some complainers have doggedly stayed on Windows 10 because they don’t like the look of 11, but if you are still using Windows 10 because your hardware can’t make the leap, then you’re in something of a quandary. Microsoft will let you pay $61 to extend support for Windows 10 until October 2026, with that sum doubling every year. So to keep Win10 until the absolute drop-dead deadline of October 2029, it would cost you over $400.

Or time to fork out the readies and buy a new machine before the October bell rings.

If you fancy a Surface, then Intel variants of last year’s ARM-powered Copilot+ machines are now available (at least for business customers), though it might make sense to wait until the summer and see what arrives, given that the current gen Surface Copilot+ machines were unveiled in May 2024.

#63B: It’s Your ISP

A miniature city with many people working on a cable line

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Following on from last week’s missive on finding problems in your home network, this one turns its attention to network of the internet service provider (ISP) itself. Just like any other utility provider, there is a lot going on behind the scenes before the pipe or cable that shows up at your property delivers its stuff. As UK Gov CTO David Knott says, the simpler something looks, the more complex it probably is.

If you think there are problems with your internet connection’s speed or reliability, and it’s not your fault, there are a few things you can do to try and pinpoint where the cause lies. Being quite specific can also help short-circuit the early stages of the supplier’s support desk, where they’ll be getting you to clear your cookies and restart your browser.

Let’s assume that any WiFi devices are working and the home router itself is connecting OK – the lights on your device are behaving like they should be connected.

No photo description available.

I bet none of you losers has their own named port on their broadband router

Sometimes the connection to the ISP might be ropey – even if the lights are on, it could be worth logging into the admin page on your router to see if there are any tell-tales or warnings. There’s probably a log of events that might show repeated disconnect/reconnect loops, or other tell-tale errors. If you have a fancy-pants NAS device or similar, you might even be able to collect the logs and give better reporting.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

It’s worth checking a public speed test site, like www.speedtest.net, to see if it thinks you should be getting decent performance. Pay attention to that Ping ms number – as mentioned previously, latency is the enemy of anything that needs real-time communications like a Teams/Zoom meeting or online gaming. Streaming video can often deal with poor latency since it will buffer at least a few seconds in advance, though if it gets really bad then it might still be unworkable.

HOW NETWORKS WORK

Without grossly oversimplifying things, when you try to connect to a remote resource (say, www.google.com), your computer will use the magic of DNS (short for the Domain Name System) to figure out what is its actual address on the internet, then will attempt to reach it.

Imagine going on a journey with tens or hundreds of junctions along the way; at each turn you don’t need to know all of the directions to the destination, only that it’s further along this road rather than the other way. When connecting to a remote internet site, there will be many “hops” that your data will take – and the connections between each of those points could be a cause of problems.

Given that the internet was conceived to survive a nuclear war, traffic should find a way but sometimes there’s a single link that can throw everything off. If a single website is slow but everything else works, it’s probably that site. But if everything seems slow or unreliable, it’s more likely there’s a problem with your ISP’s network, or possibly the network it connects to.

To test a single connection, there’s a built-in command (again, on Windows, press Win+R an enter cmd) called tracert, which will basically ping everything between you and that remote site:

In this case, it sends 3 requests and measures the round-trip time of each; sometimes you’ll see an isolated spike or a drop out but that’s not unusual. In many cases, for popular sites like Google or Bing, you’ll only really be connecting to a nearby node anyway. Look up the IP Address on whatismyipaddress.com and you’d see, in this instance, that Google.com lives in a Datacenter in London, but if the same experiment was repeated from a PC in LA, the IP address and therefore final destination that corresponds to www.google.com would be different.

If you think your network problem is a bit more transient, you could try an old bit of Windows software called WinMTR (or a lightly refreshed version called WinMTR Redux). This will repeatedly run TraceRT probes and show you the results over time; if you see one particular hop which spikes a lot and it looks like it’s part of your own ISP’s network, then it could be worth sharing this info with them in the hope they go and switch that router off and back on again…

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

In this instance, the first hop into the ISP network – 217.47.72.122 – appeared to be the problem as it and everything later had terrible latency (almost a whole second where you’d normally expect a few milliseconds). This above example was presented to a well-known UK national telecoms provider some time ago, as proof that the problem was with them, and to stop ordering the end user to faff about with ADSL microfilters or get engineers out to test the phone line.

Another example shows that while there’s no cataclysmic issue, there appears to be a delay in some of the connections further up the line – probably not worth escalating but it might explain why some sites feel slow while others don’t:

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

The nice thing about WinMTR is that you could save it to OneDrive / Google Drive and run it directly without needing to install anything. If you’re happy to add some troubleshooting software in advance of having a problem, another alternative could be PingPlotter:

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

WHAT IF IT’S DNS?

Ask anyone who has worked in IT support and at some point, the DNS infrastructure or your connection into it will be the thing that breaks everything else. Moving everything off-premises to a cloud-based environment merely means that DNS is someone else’s problem, but if you can’t figure out how to connect to the cloud, it’s yours.

Stack of blocks below text 'All modern digital infrastructure' made precarious by single small block near the bottom labelled 'DNS'

Normally, when your ISP gives you a connection, they also provide the address that your computers will use to make DNS queries. Your broadband router might act as a proxy, so the devices on the home network just ask it to resolve DNS queries, then it will connect to your ISP’s DNS service and relay the response back.

If everything else appears to be working but your connection is still flaky and slow, it may be that your ISP’s DNS service is stuffed. To the end user, you’d try to connect to www.google.com and it would spin for a while and eventually get an error saying it had timed our or could not be found; this could just be that your PC asked the router, which passed through the request to the ISP’s own DNS server(s), but if there’s a problem connecting or they’re not working properly, then a reply might not come.

Fortunately, there is an option to sidestep this – temporarily, maybe – and use somebody else’s DNS service instead.

Google operates a free, public DNS service, on addresses 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. If your ISP’s DNS is not responding well, try substituting the default automatic provisioning of DNS server addresses that your machine will likely have, with hard-coding Google’s DNS – see Get Started  |  Public DNS.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

If all else fails, you might just have to endure the ISP’s support desk to get someone to check the connection back to you, or just give up and go outside instead.